Introduction
In this article, we present a study published on April 24, 2007 in association with:
- RMC Research Corporation;
- The Medical College of Wisconsin;
- The University of Washington;
- The University of Chicago Hospitals.
This is a study to compare two types of CPR instruction:
- The first being “traditional” teaching, with a 4-hour instructor;
- The second being “self-learning” via a 22-minute video.
Immediately post-training
Traditional classes | Self-training classes | |
Assess responsiveness | 72% | 90% |
Call 911 | 82% | 71% |
Overall performance | 42% | 60% |
Ventilation volume | 40% | 61% |
Hand placement | 68% | 80% |
AVERAGE | 60.80% | 72.40% |
2 months post-training
Traditional classes | Self-training classes | |
Assess responsiveness | 60% | 77% |
Call 911 | 74% | 53% |
Overall performance | 30% | 44% |
Ventilation volume | 36% | 44% |
Hand placement | 59% | 64% |
AVERAGE | 51.80% | 56.40% |
Students who took a self-learning course were able to perform better during their final exam. Let’s not forget that the students who took the “self-learning” training had only had a video of just 22 minutes prior to the tests.
The current 4-hour CPR course is a barrier to more widespread CPR training and older adults, in particular, are underrepresented in traditional classes. Training with a “self-instruction” program has shown that this type of training can produce short-term skills performance at least as good as those observed with “traditional” training.
This study was conducted on two hundred and eighty-five (285) adults aged 40 to 70 years who had never attended or had not received CPR training in the last 5 years. Candidates were randomly assigned to a control group without training. The two groups were divided into one or other of the following formulas:
- The “traditional” type of training with the help of a teacher, in class and lasting 4 hours;
- “Self-learning” type training via one of the three versions of a brief self-instruction video of 22 minutes.
CPR skills post-training performance was assessed using a scenario model by human examiners and a two-stage sensor manikin:
- Time 1 (immediately post-training);
- Time 2 (2 months after training).
Conclusion
At Time 1 and Time 2, the examiners rated the self-trained subjects better than the traditionally trained subjects, with the exception of dialing 911.
The dummy’s data revealed that the performance of the self-trained subjects was better than that of the subjects trained traditionally at all times.
Self-trained subjects showed better performance for ventilation volume, hand placement and compression depth at Time 1 and Time 2.
Performance by controls has been evaluated only once. Subjects with “traditional” cardio-rescue training and “self-trained” subjects generally showed similar rates of decline.
Two hundred and eighty-five (285) adults aged 40 to 70 years who participated in this study experienced a reduction in the performance of their CPR skills after a 2-month post-training interval. This decline is essentially the same as that observed in subjects who followed either of these two types of training (traditional or self-learning).
Traditionnal classes :
- 4-hour CPR training called “Heartsaver” with instructor in class.
Self-training classes:
- 22-minute video CPR self-directed training courses (VSI).
References:
- Swor, R., Compton, S., Farr, L. et al, Perceived self-efficacy in performing and willingness to learn cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an elderly population in a suburban community. Am J Crit Care. 2003;12:65–70
- Todd, K.H., Heron, S.L., Thompson, M. et al, Simple CPR: a randomized, controlled trial of video self-instructional cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in an African American church congregation. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34:730–737
- Todd, K.H., Braslow, A., Brennan, R.T. et al, Randomized, controlled trial of video self-instruction versus traditional CPR training. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;31:364–369
- Ramirez, A.G., Weaver, F.J., Raizner, A.E., Dorfman, S.B., Herrick, K.L., Gotto, A.M. The efficacy of lay CPR instruction: an evaluation. Am J Public Health. 1977;67:1093–1095
- Kaye, W., Rallis, S.F., Mancini, M.E. et al, The problem of poor retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills may lie with the instructor, not the learner or the curriculum. Resuscitation. 1991;21:67–87
- Berden, H.J., Willems, F.F., Hendrick, J.M. et al, How frequently should basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation training be repeated to maintain adequate skills?. Br Med J. 1993;306:1576–1577
- Brennan, R.T., Braslow, A. Skill mastery in public CPR classes. Am J Emerg Med. 1998;16:653–657
- Chamberlain, D., Smith, A., Colquhon, M. et al, Randomised controlled trials of staged teaching for basic life support. 2. Comparison of CPR performance and skill retention using either staged instruction or conventional training. Resuscitation. 2001;50:27–37
- Edwards, M.J., Hannah, K.J. An examination of the use of interactive videodisc cardiopulmonary resuscitation instruction for the lay community. Comput Nurs. 1985;3:250–252
- Kaye, W., Mancini, M.E. Teaching adult resuscitation in the United States—time for a rethink. Resuscitation. 1998;37:177–187
- Moser, D.K., Dracup, K., Guzy, P.M. et al, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills retention in family members of cardiac patients. Am J Emerg Med. 1990;8:498–503
- Morgan, C.L., Donnelly, P.D., Lester, C.A., Assar, D.H. Effectiveness of the BBC’s 999 training roadshows on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: video performance of cohort unforewarned participants at home six months afterwards. BMJ. 1996;313:912–916
- Donnelly, P., Assar, D., Lester, C. A comparison of manikin CPR performance by lay persons trained in three variations of basic life support guidelines. Resuscitation. 2000;45:195–199
- Handley, A.J., Handley, J.A. Improving CPR performance using an audible feedback system suitable for incorporation into an automated external defibrillator. Resuscitation. 2003;57:57–62
- Eisenberg, M.S., Damon, S., Mandel, L. et al, CPR instruction by videotape: results of a community project. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;25:198–202
- Pane, G.A., Salness, K.A. A survey of participants in a mass CPR training course. Ann Emerg Med. 1987;16:1112–1116
- Brennan, R.T. Student, instructor, and course factors predicting achievement in CPR training classes. Am J Emerg Med. 1991;9:220–224
- Brennan, R.T., Braslow, A. Are we training the right people yet? A survey of participants in public cardiopulmonary resuscitation classes. Resuscitation. 1998;37:21–25
- Wik, L., Brennan, R.T., Braslow, A. A peer-training model for instruction of basic cardiac life support. Resuscitation. 1995;29:119–128
- Flint, L.S., Billi, J.E., Kelly, K., Mandel, L., Newell, L., Stapleton, E.R. Education in adult basic life support training programs. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22:468–474
- Lynch, B., Einspruch, E.L., Nichol, G. et al, Effectiveness of a 30-minute CPR self-instruction program for lay responders: a controlled randomized study. Resuscitation. 2005;67:31–43
- Batcheller, A.M., Brennan, R.T., Braslow, A. et al, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance of subjects over forty is better following half-hour video self-instruction compared to traditional 4-hour classroom training. Resuscitation. 2000;43:101–110
- Braslow, A., Brennan, R.T., Newman, M.M. et al, CPR training without an instructor: development and evaluation of a video self-instructional system for effective performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 1997;34:207–220
- Starr, L.M. An effective CPR home learning system: a program evaluation. AAOHN J. 1998;46:289–295
- Boyle, A.J., Wilson, A.M., Connelly, K. et al, Improvement in timing and effectiveness of external cardiac compressions with a new non-invasive device: the CPR-Ezy. Resuscitation. 2002;54:63–67
- Wik, L., Myklebust, H., Auestad, B.H., Steen, P.A. Retention of basic life support skills 6 months after training with an automated voice advisory manikin system without instructor involvement. Resuscitation. 2002;52:273–279
- Knowles, M. The adult learner: a neglected species. Gulf Publishing, Houston, TX; 1984
- Knowles, M. Self-directed learning: a guide for learners and teachers. Association Press, New York; 1975
- Cross, K.P. Adults as learners: increasing participation and facilitating learning. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco; 1981
- Chamberlain, D.A., Hazinski, M.F. Education in resuscitation: an ILCOR symposium. Circulation. 2003;108:2575–2594
- Birnbaum, A., McBurnie, M.A., Powell, J. et al, Modeling instructor preferences for CPR and AED competence estimation. Resuscitation. 2005;64:333–339
- Moser, D.K., Coleman, S. Recommendations for improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills retention. Heart Lung. 1992;21:372–380
- SAS software, Version 8.2 of the SAS System for Windows. Copyright© 1999–2001 SAS Institute Inc. SAS and all other SAS Institute Inc. product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks of SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
- Hedges, L., Olkin, I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press, New York; 1985
- Weaver, F.J., Ramirez, A.G., Dorfman, S.B., Raizner, A.E. Trainee’s retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: how quickly they forget. JAMA. 1979;241:901–903
- Dracup, K., Doering, L.V., Moser, D.K., Evangelista, L. Retention and use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills in parents of infants at risk for cardiopulmonary arrest. Pediatric Nurs. 1998;24:219–225
- Tweed, W.A., Wilson, E., Isfeld, B. Retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills after initial overtraining. Crit Care Med. 1980;8:651–653
- Seaman, J.E., Greene, B.G., Watson-Perczel, M. A behavioral system for assessing and training cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills among emergency medical technicians. J Appl Behav Anal. 1986;19:125–135
- Woollard, M., Whitfiled, R., Smith, A. et al, Skill acquisition and retention in automated external defibrillator (AED) use and CPR by lay responders: a prospective study. Resuscitation. 2004;60:17–28
- Gass, D.A., Curry, L. Physicians’ and nurses’ retention of knowledge and skill after training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Can Med Assoc J. 1983;128:550–551
- Ali, J., Cohen, R., Adam, R. et al, Attrition of cognitive and trauma management skills after the advanced trauma life support (ATLS) course. J Trauma: Injury Infect Crit Care. 1996;40:860–866
- Kaczorowski, J., Levitt, C., Hammond, M. et al, Retention of neonatal resuscitation skills and knowledge: a randomized controlled trial. Family Med. 1998;30:705–711
- Stross, J.K. Maintaining competency in advanced cardiac life support skills. JAMA. 1983;249:3339–3341
- American Heart Association. AHA Guidelines 2005. Circulation 2005;112:IV-12–IV-17
- Palese, A., Trenti, G., Sbrojavacca, R. Effectiveness of retraining after basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation courses: a literature review. Assist Inferm Ric. 2003;22:68–75